[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [orbit-dev] How to obscufate email addresses?
|
E-Mail addresses inside (xml) documents should not be a
problem (I'd hope).
Printed in plaintext on an HTML page is less cool, and
Christian's suggestion
sounds good.
I think that even slight obfuscation like martin.oberhuber
{at} windriver.com
is better than nothing.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical
Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project
Lead, DSDP PMC Member
> I'd think that a
contact info is in order, if it's shown in a format
> that's readable by
humans only but not by spambots.
Good thing I asked ... I was going to just put "mailto: ...." with
what ever email was in ip_log xml file. I assume that's what spam bots would
be good at finding? Should those be obscufated in xml file too? (Those files
used to be in CVS only, but now I upload them to download server with every
build, to have a snapshot, and to have them available to compute data on
summary page).
Any
suggestions how to represent contact info?
Thanks,
From:
| "Oberhuber, Martin"
<Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
To:
| "Orbit Developer discussion"
<orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Date:
| 03/11/2008 08:34 AM
|
Subject:
| RE: [orbit-dev] Check out these
beautiful new download pages! |
Hi Dave,
thanks for these
great enhancements!
I'd think that a contact info is in order, if it's shown in
a format that's readable
by
humans only but not by spambots.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
From: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Dienstag, 11.
März 2008 02:44
To: Orbit Developer discussion
Subject:
RE: [orbit-dev] Check out these beautiful new download pages!
> Is that a happy coincidence or is it
the case that we are only shipping ones that have Orbit CQs?
The later, all bundles
have Orbit CQs ... with 2 qualifications: 1. I didn't actually check all the
CQ numbers -- that they exist, that they are in tools.orbit -- the page just
finds and lists the CQ numbers in the "ip_logs" files that committers have
provided, and 2) since I was making the webpage to report missing ip_logs,
before I announced it, I made sure there was an ip_log for everything :)
There was a CQ for all the missing ones I added, but in some
cases was not correctly entered in the tools.orbit project, so I entered ones
for those cases.
The page basically lists all the bundles we build (not necessarily
all the ones in cvs .. as others have pointed out (DJ?) ... I think there is
some in cvs that are not built, since not in the feature.xml file ... not sure
if that's intentional, or an oversight.
And, then once the page has the list of all the
bundles we build, the page searches through all the ip_log files looking for
matching bundle IDs and versions, and then "merges" the data together. Besides
listing a found CQ number, two other outcomes are "No IP Log file exists" or
"No CQ for this version exists".
It should make it easier to "manually" check that
all bundles are covered, and provide an ongoing quick check as new bundles are
added. Long term, I suppose, someone could write SQL queries to look up the CQ
number and verify the data ... but, not sure it's worth the effort and/or we
could have JUnit tests to flag an error if data was missing ... but, I like
the visual-and-hyperlinking display of information better as a starting point.
The other question I hear a lot is "who should I contact about bundle
so-and-so" ... so, if no objections, one other piece of data I'll display
(eventually) is a column of "contacts" for each bundle.
From:
| "Jeff McAffer"
<jeff@xxxxxxxxx>
|
To:
| "'Orbit Developer discussion'"
<orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Date:
| 03/10/2008 07:17 PM
|
Subject:
| RE: [orbit-dev] Check out these
beautiful new download pages! |
This
is great! I especially like that all bundles on the page have
corresponding Orbit CQs!! Is that a happy coincidence or is it the case
that we are only shipping ones gthat have Orbit CQs?
Thanks David
for all your work on this. Very useful.
Jeff
From: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Monday, March
10, 2008 4:34 AM
To: Orbit Developer discussion
Subject:
[orbit-dev] Check out these beautiful new download pages!
Beginning this week, I've tried to convey more
information in the download pages, so it will be easier to tell when
a
bundle may or may not have the proper book-keeping files and CQs in place.
For example, see
http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/committers/drops/I20080310070939/
Eventually I may add more info to this summary page, to help
others (committers and legal staff) to check for accuracy, etc. .... and, who
knows,
maybe it'll even be pretty one day. :)
So ...
please click around and make sure _your_ links are accurate and ... harder to
spot ... that there are none omitted.
Thanks, _______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing
list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing
list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev