Re: [orbit-dev] Orbit IP Log

[Christian Damus <cdamus@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, DJ,

By "one for adding the contribution
to Orbit", do you mean that there should be an IPzilla with the "approved_one_project"
status for the tools.orbit project for Orbit's permission to use the bundle?
 Or, do you mean the "approved_all_projects" IPzilla for
the original contribution of the bundle to Eclipse?  As I understood
it, we needed only to reference the IPzilla granting permission (approved_one_project)
to the (non-Orbit) project that was an original user of the bundle.

Cheers,

Christian

---

Christian W. Damus
Component Lead, Eclipse OCL
and EMF-QTV
IBM
Rational Software

DJ Houghton/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/08/07 11:11 AM

Please respond to
Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [orbit-dev] Orbit IP Log

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe
there should be at least
2 IP Zilla entries... one for adding the contribution to Orbit and then
one
for each approval to each project that is using it. In this case I would
reference the original entry for adding the bundle to Orbit so we wouldn't
run into the updating problem that you describe.



orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/08/2007 10:08:19 AM:

>
> Thanks, DJ,
>
> They're all in there, with the 'historical' keyword.
>
> One more thing ... some of these contributions (such as Batik) have
> multiple IPzillae, one per project (e.g., GMF, BIRT, TPTP).  Should
> we select only one of these to include in the IP Log?  (I would
take
> GMF as I am a Modeling Project committer)  Otherwise, as more
> consumers get approvals to use any Orbit bundle, we'll find
> ourselves updating the log each time.
>
> cW
>
>
> Christian W. Damus
> Component Lead, Eclipse OCL and EMF-QTV
> IBM Rational Software
>
>

>
> DJ Houghton/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
> Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 05/08/07 09:43 AM
>
> Please respond to
> Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> To
>
> Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [orbit-dev] Orbit IP Log
>
>
>
>
> I believe that the foundation created IP Zilla entries for all
> contributions...even the old ones. I just did a search in IP Zilla
for
> javax.servlet and found a couple of entries. (for multiple versions)
>
>
>
> orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/08/2007 09:28:13 AM:
>
> >
> > Hi, DJ,
> >
> > The XML format seems to require an IPzilla.  Unfortunately,
all of
> > my contributions were approved in the pre-IPzilla age.
> >
> > Do you have an example of how to configure a IPzillaless project?
> > The javax.servlet bundle falls into this category, I should think.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Christian
> >
> >
> > Christian W. Damus
> > Component Lead, Eclipse OCL and EMF-QTV
> > IBM Rational Software
> >
> >
>
> >
> > DJ Houghton/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
> > Sent by: orbit-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > 05/04/07 01:51 PM
> >
> > Please respond to
> > Orbit Developer discussion <orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > To
> >
> > orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> >
> > [orbit-dev] Orbit IP Log
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > As discussed on the wiki page:
> >      http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Orbit_IP_Log
> > we have been working towards creating an IP Log file in Orbit
which
> > contains information about each project.
> >
> > We have written a script which will process each file and present
this
> > information in a meaningful manner. This will also be used to
dynamically
> > keep track of what bundles and versions are in Orbit. (no more
need to
> keep
> > updating a static web page somewhere)
> >
> > Here is what we would like each project owner to do:
> >
> > - Create the file
> >      - create a file called <bundle_name>.ip_log
in
> > /org.eclipse.orbit.releng/ip_log
> >      - note that we are still using the "set1"
branch in this project
> > - Populate the file
> >      - for each version of the bundle, create
a <project...> element in
> > the file
> >      - populate it with the appropriate information
> >
> > I have put a template file on the wiki page which most people
will just
> be
> > able to take and fill in the appropriate values. If you have
multiple
> JARs
> > in your bundle which are contributed under multiple licenses
then your
> > resulting file will differ from the template.
> >
> > Please direct comments/questions/concerns to the orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > mailing list.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > orbit-dev mailing list
> > orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > orbit-dev mailing list
> > orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> orbit-dev mailing list
> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev
> _______________________________________________
> orbit-dev mailing list
> orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev

_______________________________________________
orbit-dev mailing list
orbit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-dev