[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [omr-dev] GitHub Label Taxonomy?
|
I like this idea.
Perhaps a better word for "Feature" could be "Improvement"?
In my head, "Feautre" is too specific to accommodate things like
architectural changes.
--
Leonardo
On 28/09/16 02:20 PM, Matthew Gaudet wrote:
> With Issues being used more and more, I'm proposing we create a set of
> labels to help us manage our issues. Philosophically, I think we should
> favour simplicity over complexity, so it's important that not too many
> different labels get created.
>
> My first draft set of labels would be as follows:
>
> Types:
>
> 1. Bug
> 2. Feature
> 3. Docs
>
> Components:
>
> 1. GC
> 2. Port
> 3. Thread
> 4. JIT
> 5. Test
>
>
> I think an important part of community building would be the final label
> to be used in conjunction with Bug:
>
> 1. StarterBug -- for Bugs that the originator believes could be tackled
> by a relative beginner.
>
>
> This is of course just a starter draft. I'd love to hear what others
> think.
>
> -- Matthew
>
> _______________________________________________
> omr-dev mailing list
> omr-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
> unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/omr-dev
>
