Re: [omr-dev] our coding standard

["Ronald Servant" <Ronald_Servant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Reviewing the new Chromium, I'd revise my earlier vote to only +1 for Webkit.

 

Ron.

 

----- Original message -----
From: Matthew Gaudet <magaudet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: omr-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: omr developer discussions <omr-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [omr-dev] our coding standard
Date: Tue, Aug 30, 2016 4:29 PM
 

>
> Has anyone had a chance to review the auto formatted versions
> of OMR that Matthew thoughtfully put together for us? For your
> convenience:
>
> * LLVM      https://github.com/mgaudet/omr/commits/clang-format-llvm
> * Webkit    https://github.com/mgaudet/omr/commits/clang-format-webkit
> * Mozilla   https://github.com/mgaudet/omr/commits/clang-format-mozilla
> * Chromium  https://github.com/mgaudet/omr/commits/clang-format-chromium
> * Google    https://github.com/mgaudet/omr/commits/clang-format-google
>
> I would like to decide by the end of the week, if possible. My vote is
> for LLVM.
>
> What do you think?

It was just pointed out to me, that despite the branch names, I
accidentally pushed some duplicate branches: Chromium and Google were
not correctly done due to human error.

*whoops*.

That's now been rectified.


_______________________________________________
omr-dev mailing list
omr-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/omr-dev