[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [nebula-dev] First peek at update site
|
Sure i'm down with that. Does everybody agree with the current names proposed by Mickael?
If there are no objections we can make the nebula download sites live.
Best regards,
Wim
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Mickael Istria
<mickael.istria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 09/12/2011 12:20, Wim Jongman wrote:
And how would the complete set if names be if we need
to include eclipse versions (indigo ..)?
I'm still unsure on the existence of any good reason to put Eclipse
version names in the update-site or release name.
Nebula mainly relies on SWT and JFace APIs that are very stable, and
I don't think Nebula will hit some compatibility issues that would
require the publication of specific update-site for each Eclipse
release.
There was a discussion on the cross-project mailing-list about how
relevant it is to bind a release of an Eclipse project to an Eclipse
release [1]. What I conclude of this is that doing it is an
extra-effort for both producers and consumers, and that it is
generally useless.
So my answer to your question is "let's wait for the need to happen,
good ideas with come with it" ;)
[1]
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg06815.html
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev