Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [mylyn-reviews-dev] Gerrit 2.9

Hi Sam,

today I started looking into it. Unfortunately I'm already stuck at
setting up the workspace.

The Maven build without tests runs sucessfully.

In Eclipse most of the projects have build errors. I activated the
gerrit.target is there anything else I need to do? I'm on Luna, cloned
ssh://git.eclipse.org:29418/mylyn/org.eclipse.mylyn.reviews and chose
"import existing projects"

Greetings
-Sascha-

Am 20.06.2014 19:28, schrieb Sam Davis:
> Just to be clear, by "pushing a change to Gerrit" I meant "pushing a
> change to the Gerrit connector to the Eclipse.org Gerrit server."
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sam Davis
> Software Engineer, Tasktop Dev
> Committer, Eclipse Mylyn
> http://tasktop.com
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Sam Davis <sam.davis@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:sam.davis@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     Thanks for the heads up that the API is changing. I'm not sure what
>     you could do to get 2.9-rc2 supported sooner other than pushing a
>     change to Gerrit. ;) I've opened a bug to track this. At this point
>     I'm not sure when we'll be able to address it:
> 
>     437825: support Gerrit 2.9 with API changes
>     https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=437825
> 
>     Cheers,
>     Sam
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Sam Davis
>     Software Engineer, Tasktop Dev
>     Committer, Eclipse Mylyn
>     http://tasktop.com
> 
> 
>     On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Sascha Vogt <sascha.vogt@xxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:sascha.vogt@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>         Hi all,
> 
>         recently I upgraded our Gerrit to 2.9-rc2 - Unfortunately this broke
>         Mylyn Reviews (I'm on the snapshots - weekly)
> 
>         Opening a task reveals: "Problem while retrieving Gerrit
>         review.: Gerrit
>         connection issue: No such service method"
> 
>         So it looks like Gerrit broke its API again.
> 
>         Anything I could do to get this implemented rather sooner than
>         later? ;)



Back to the top