Re: [mylyn-reviews-dev] Bugzilla components

[Kilian Matt <kilian.matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Alvaro,

the problem with that was that there may already be components with
the same name, which could cause confusion if someone wants to file a
bug for the integration rather than the implementation. So in order to
be more concise the connector was added to the name to clarify that.

kilian

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:28 PM, alvaro sanchez <alvsan09@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
> Before voting could you clarify if the scope for the Gerrit component and
> Task has changed ?
> i.e. adding the word "connector" may be a bit restrictive .. so are the
> components expected to be full review tool implementations or limited to the
> connector functionality?
>
> Thanks
> /Alvaro
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Steffen Pingel <steffen.pingel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> sorry to reopen this discussion but we recently changed the naming
>> scheme for Bugzilla components for the other Mylyn sub-projects to
>> avoid confusion. I was wondering if this would also make sense for the
>> Reviews project.
>>
>> So instead of Framework, Gerrit, SCM, Tasks, R4E we would end up with
>> the following components:
>>
>>  Framework
>>  Gerrit Connector
>>  R4E
>>  Tasks Connector
>>
>> I am not sure that we need an SCM component since SCM related bugs
>> should be tracked in the Mylyn Versions project or fall under the
>> Framework component.
>>
>> Can we hold a quick vote on this proposal?
>>
>> Steffen
>>
>> --
>> Steffen Pingel
>> Committer, http://eclipse.org/mylyn
>> Senior Developer, http://tasktop.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> mylyn-reviews-dev mailing list
>> mylyn-reviews-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-reviews-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mylyn-reviews-dev mailing list
> mylyn-reviews-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-reviews-dev
>
>