[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [mylyn-reviews-dev] Git structure
|
I'm in favor for keeping the structure as flat as possible. It makes
it easier to find bundles for developers not familiar with the
internal project structure. When looking at other projects such as cdt
or ecf I am always confused where to start looking for a specific
plug-in.
The namespaces of the bundles should provide sufficient separation to
differentiate components.
Steffen
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Kilian Matt
<kilian.matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as we soon have a few more projects in our git repository, I would
> like to ask, what structure is preferred.
>
> flat: all eclipse projects in one directory
> e.g.
> /org.eclipse.mylyn.reviews.framework
> /org.eclipse.mylyn.reviews.gerrit.core
> /org.eclipse.mylyn.reviews.gerrit.ui
> ...
>
> nested: one directory for each (sub)project containing its eclipse projects
> /tbr/org.eclipse.mylyn.reviews.tbr.core
> /tbr/org.eclipse.mylyn.reviews.tbr.ui
> /framework + subfolders
>
>
> With the flat structure it's maybe easier to check the whole project
> out at once, while the second one is a bit more organized and more
> suitable for maven tycho.
>
> Kilian
> _______________________________________________
> mylyn-reviews-dev mailing list
> mylyn-reviews-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-reviews-dev
>
--
Steffen Pingel
Committer, http://eclipse.org/mylyn
Senior Developer, http://tasktop.com
