[mdt-ocl.dev] Impact Analyzer and the Standard Library Model

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[mdt-ocl.dev] Impact Analyzer and the Standard Library Model

From: Axel Uhl <eclipse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:42:28 +0200
Delivered-to: mdt-ocl.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/mdt-ocl.dev>
List-help: <mailto:mdt-ocl.dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-ocl.dev>, <mailto:mdt-ocl.dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/mdt-ocl.dev>, <mailto:mdt-ocl.dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11

How will the new OCL Standard Library model capture the bodies for theOCL-specified library operations? At least for those specified in OCL,the Impact Analyzer could be ridded of its special rules used in theiranalysis. Of course, natively implemented and prominent operations willstill need special treatment.

Summarizing the question: what't the metamodel for the standard librarymodel including the operation bodies use in it?


Best,
-- Axel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] Impact Analyzer and the Standard Library Model
  - From: ed

Prev by Date: [mdt-ocl.dev] Pre/Post Validation
Next by Date: Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] Pre/Post Validation
Previous by thread: [mdt-ocl.dev] Pre/Post Validation
Next by thread: Re: [mdt-ocl.dev] Impact Analyzer and the Standard Library Model
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs