[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jwt-dev] JWT build & SOA PMC meeting notes
|
Hi Chris
about the upcoming release :
* we should update the website introductory blurb to something
including "SOA" (TLP) and "extensible", "heterogeneous" (or something
like that, I'll propose one shortly)
* in feature, branding, build (anywhere else ?), we should a. change
everything talking about Technology to SOA, b. update the JWT
introductory blurbs to the website introductory blurb
* finally we should be ready to update the version
* we should change the download category from General Purpose Tools
to SOA in the yearly release update site, as OK'ed by Zsolt in an email
on May the 19th
How far are we from that ? (If we can't do it, we're not ready for 1.0.0
to be our next version number)
other things :
* review slides are due on May the 28th, I can do them if you're OK
with that
* I've commited copy/paste for aspects yesterday
& my answers in the text :
Christian Saad a écrit :
Hi Marc,
thanks for participating and the status update.
A few notes from my side:
* I think it would be best to postpone the technical part of the move
to SOA until after Helios so we're not in risk of failing some
critical release date due to technical difficulties. Afterwards, as
you said, it's time to set the wheels in motion ;)
Agreed
* Is it planned to integrate with the SOA build or are we going to
keep our own build process? (which I think we could do since we don't
have dependencies to other SOA projects). In the former case, is there
already a decision who will do the releng for SOA in the future?
Depends on what's gonna be done in SOA, but a sensible thing would be to
merge builds if / when they go to Athena CBI-based build
* Since we already have a branding for JWT we're on the safe side for
Helios and I think it's a good idea to leave it at that for the
release. Maybe we could discuss it again after the release? (but it's
probably not the most important issue and we'll have a full year for
the next release)
Agreed
* For the SOA introduction page: What's your opinion on opening a wiki
page where all projects can work on the page before submitting it to
the IWG?
Not approved yet, still being discussed
Thanks again!
Regards,
Chris
Am 19.05.2010 11:06, schrieb Marc Dutoo:
Hi Chris
Thanks for the info, you're showing a lot of obstination indeed, good
luck !
Besides, my notes of what was said during the SOA PMC meeting
yesterday :
---++ SOA TLP PMC conf call 20100518
* provisioning : jwt still under technology because of build
process ((hope you agree)) ; TODO LATER under soa provisioning,
including opening the right bugzillas & changing the project metadata
accordingly
* branding : jwt keeps his (also update the website blurbs), others
don't have one ; but an introductory page to the whole SOA package
that includes the blurbs and website of every subprojects would be
nice -> TODO Marc proposal "introductory page" on the mailing list,
so the IWG can discuss it
* website : TODO update & sync the SOA & own website blurbs (we
have the right to edit the SOA website for that)
Regards,
Marc
Christian Saad a écrit :
Hi Marc,
just FYI: I'm trying a few new angles, so there are a lot of fail
messages atm. The build is now started as an ant instead of a shell
script which allowed to switch to a newer version of the basebuilder
which seems to do a good job with the old compile problem. However,
it fails during the pack200 stage which seems to be a known bug.
Regards,
Chris
_______________________________________________
jwt-dev mailing list
jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev
_______________________________________________
jwt-dev mailing list
jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev
Regards,
Marc
