[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jwt-dev] Back again, flying over the emails
|
Hi Florian,
Welcome back ! Hope you've had a good time ^^
Thanks for the useful information about making a release there :
http://wiki.eclipse.org/JWT_DeveloperFAQ , I'll add more of my own -
though maybe it should go in its own page.
I've tried to test JWT 0.5 without the update site, but how do you
install the downloadable jars ?
I'll be at the ESE and the STPIM meeting. If we can also meet at other
times, for work or non-work purpose, that will be fine. Keep you up to
date ;)
I'm available today or tomorrow for a conf call ; today would be perfect.
Regards,
Marc
Florian Lautenbacher a écrit :
Hi there,
as I'm back from vacation now, I'm trying to read through all the
emails that have been written during the last weeks concerning JWT. If
you are waiting for a reply to your email, please just wait a few days
more and I'll answer asap.
I'm happy to see that finally the release 0.5 has been finished and
can now be uploaded to the website. So we can now focus on release 0.6
which will fully focus on vendors and how they can extend and modify
the workflow editor. This release is currently planned for the middle
of December; let's keep the fingers crossed that we can hold this
deadline.
Since the Eclipse Summit Europe is already in two weeks, I hope to see
many of you guys to discuss topics concerning JWT. As I've seen on the
STP-mailing list, the committers from STP plan to have a meeting in
advance on the 18th. I will also be coming to Ludwigsburg on the 18th
already, so I hope to join the STP meeting together with some others
from JWT mabe. Who of you is planning to be there and from when to
when? (I'm there from 18th lunch till 20th till the end of the
conference).
I've also seen a lot of emails concerning CQs: thanks to Mickael and
Chris who finally found out when a CQ is needed and when not. The last
time I'd contacted Sharon, I got the impression that every time a new
component is added to JWT (doesn't matter whether written by
committers during the project or not), we need a CQ. It is good to
know that this is not the case and especially the small extensions
we've written for transformations, views, etc. can easily be
committed. Sorry for the confusion that arose from this impression!
Thanks, Marc, for creating a Wiki page for the discussion how JWT and
STP might belong together and where the differences are. I'll try to
fill this page with more life in the next few days.
The requirements specified by Pierre are also very fruitful for our
planning for the next releases. I will go through the list of
requirements and will discuss with others what we will be able to do
and till when and integrate these issues into our project plan as well
as create bug entries for each of those.
There have also been many other discussions (e.g. with JBoss) which I
would like to get to know in more detail, so I guess a phone
conference would be a good thing in this or the coming week. Marc,
what about your availability in the next few days?
Best regards,
Florian
---------------------------------------
Dipl.-Inf. Florian Lautenbacher
Programming Distributed Systems Lab
Institute of Computer Science
University of Augsburg
Universitätsstr. 14
86135 Augsburg, Germany
Attention: NEW phone number!
phone: +49 821 598-3102
fax: +49 821 598-2175
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
jwt-dev mailing list
jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev