Re: AW: [jwt-dev] jwt editor installation

[Mickael Istria <mickael.istria@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Charles,

Have you installed missing plug-ins such as EMF, GEF, draw2d in your 
Eclipse? You can verify it in your Help > Software Updates > manage 
configuration whether they are available.
It is possible that Ganymede JEE does not include EMG, GEF & co...

Good luck
Mickael

Souillard Charles a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> sorry for my next stupid question but I am not able to install my JWT 
> env correctly...
> I have installed ganymede (jee developpers version) + TPTP and 
> downloaded the three projects (up to date of this morning):
> - we : 9866 errors
> - transformation-base : 16 errors
> - xpdl : no error
> I have successfully installed we editor thanks to update site.
> I have tried with jdk 1.5 and jdk 1.6 and error nb is the same.
> Errors are concerning emf, gef, draw2d...
> I don't understand because I have for example emf.commmon in my 
> plugins directory but the package is not found in eclipse java editor...
>
> Is it that there is a conflict between ganymede and my eclipse or is 
> it an environment pb on my side ?
>
> thanks for your help.
> Charles
>
> Marc Dutoo a écrit :
> > Hi
> >
> > JWT CVS HEAD currently requires Eclipse 3.4 platform (new tabbed 
> > properties extension), and will work indiferently on JDK 1.5 or 6 .
> >
> > I'm currently working on updating JWT CVS to Ganymede in the 
> > METAMODELEXT branch, migrated EMF templates already works and there's 
> > just a few issues with icons to check.
> >
> > Christian, I agree quite a few things have changed, and because of 
> > the same reasons I also approve Ganymede being a requirement.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marc
> >
> > Christian Saad a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > jwt-we 0.4.0 works well on Eclipse 3.3, it does not require 3.4. 
> > > Also, as
> > > Mickael wrote, a JRE 5 should be sufficient.
> > > There seem to be, in fact, some problems concerning Ganymede since some
> > > parts of the API have changed, e.g. the handling of files (opening, 
> > > saving).
> > > However, there is currently some work on the way to adapt jwt-we to
> > > Ganymede. I think, that this could become an obligatory requirement 
> > > in the
> > > future as it probably would be very challenging to support both APIs 
> > > at the
> > > same time and some new features of 3.4 are very handy.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Christian
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jwt-dev mailing list
> > > jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev
> > >   
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jwt-dev mailing list
> > jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jwt-dev