Re: [jta-dev] In regards "Maybe CDI dependency in module-info.java shoul

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [jta-dev] In regards "Maybe CDI dependency in module-info.java should be static"

From: Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:23:35 +0000
Delivered-to: jta-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jta-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:jta-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jta-dev>, <mailto:jta-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jta-dev>, <mailto:jta-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

If anyone has any input they would like to share, please can I invite them to do so?

Thank you,

Tom

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 10:16, Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I am writing to raise awareness of an outstanding pull request that was raised last year:
https://github.com/jakartaee/transactions/pull/212

There is an issue too:
https://github.com/jakartaee/transactions/issues/214

The possibility that the change might need an accompanying specification change (to make CDI optional in the specification itself) is there. That might imply needing something other than a service release for EE10, so I would appreciate feedback from others on how to approach the change.

Many thanks,
Tom

References:
- [jta-dev] In regards "Maybe CDI dependency in module-info.java should be static"
  - From: Tom Jenkinson

Prev by Date: [jta-dev] In regards "Maybe CDI dependency in module-info.java should be static"
Next by Date: [jta-dev] OK to suspend() if marked for rollback?
Previous by thread: [jta-dev] In regards "Maybe CDI dependency in module-info.java should be static"
Next by thread: [jta-dev] OK to suspend() if marked for rollback?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs