| Re: [jaxrs-dev] question of Intraprocess or Interprocess ? |
_______________________________________________As this discussion meanwhile is concentrating on EJB, and as this is the mailing list of JAX-RS, I need to ask to move this thread away from this mailing list. It is simply off-topic. Thanks.
-Markus
Von: jaxrs-dev [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Som Lima
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. März 2021 19:16
An: jaxrs developer discussions
Cc: cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [jaxrs-dev] question of Intraprocess or Interprocess ?
I disagree it is rudimentary because inorder to choose which EE components to use and which to reject one needs to second guess the EE component specification developers.
Application developers and system architects have to make such decisions in the commercial sector.
Technology Ambassador and advocates want application developers to buy everything they are selling. That has been identified as the cause of software crisis.
If you know the concepts as I do now I can reject technologies and choose to use them based on such criteria for example flexibility and future product planning.
Also for your information you have clearly not worked in safety critical environments . In those environments they develop their own APIs , third party APIs are not permitted.
Simple put your work would not be entertained.
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, 17:54 Reza Rahman, <reza_rahman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just my two cents - this sort of discussion is for places like JavaRanch/CodeRanch. It’s a bit too rudimentary for specification developer mailing lists at the Eclipse Foundation. It may even be too rudimentary for Stack Overflow. If I understand the book reference correctly, it is out of date by about a decade or so.
Reza Rahman
Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Blogger, Speaker
Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.
On Mar 24, 2021, at 1:41 PM, Markus KARG <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No the book is not wrong. It is just simplifying. At time the book was written, the typical use case was that enterprise beans NEVER were unsed intra-process; this scenario is rather now, so possibly the book was just old or too simplified.
-Markus
Von: jaxrs-dev [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Som Lima
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. März 2021 18:29
An: jaxrs developer discussions
Cc: cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [jaxrs-dev] question of Intraprocess or Interprocess ?
BUCKET LIST ITEM
Thank you sir.
I read in an o'reilly book " the difference between a Bean and an Enterprise Bean is a bean is an intraprocess (tightly coupled) and an Enterprise Bean is an Interprocess (loosely coupled).
The two of you have clarified that it is simply to do with running in same JVM intraprocess) or remote JVM(interprocess).
As you know for example an EJB like JAX-RS can be run in both local JVM and remote JVM therefore the o'reilly book definition was WRONG.
I had in mind that if ever I come across experts I will seek clarification.
I can check that item off my Bucket List.
Essentially the two are plugins with one running in same JVM and the other running in two JVMs.
Regards
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, 17:04 Markus KARG, <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes to everything besides the last sentence, as "container managed" simply describes whether your application manages lifecycle or container manages lifecycle, and it has nothing to do with process communication or binding strategy.
I wonder what you are actually doing? Writing an informatics dictionary?
-Markus
Von: jaxrs-dev [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Som Lima
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. März 2021 21:36
An: jaxrs developer discussions
Cc: cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [jaxrs-dev] question of Intraprocess or Interprocess ?
Thank you Gentlemen for shedding light on this.
It is very much appreciated and very clear. I wish to move onto two other descriptions to tie up a loose end. "tight coupling " and "loose coupling" and find out if there is any relationship to Interprocess or intraprocess.
I read somewhere that " a bean is an intraprocess (tightly bound) and an EJB is an interprocess (loosely coupled)."
This text implied intraprocess to mean tightly bound and Interprocess implies loosely coupled, therefore further implied it is these properties which differentiated the two.
It is my understanding an example of a tight coupling is with JSPs for example
<jsp:useBean id="person" class="org.example.model.PersonModel" scope="session"></jsp:useBean>A CDI is the same as a usebean in my understandingbecauseOne declares a class then @inject/useBean for instantiation.EJB/JAX-RS are loosely coupled by my understanding because it is a client server API therefore the logic is loosely implemented away from object instantiation.
It is my understanding you guys are saying that when either EJB or CDI are running in same JVM then they are both intraprocess.
However when an ejb/jax-rs is running in the remote server and for example the client calls has a different IP address than the server ip address in that case this is an example of Interprocess implementation. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
So if the JAX-RS is running in same JVM then it is intraprocess and if the jax-rs is running as a remote REST API then it is an Interprocess. Most definitely we can JAX-RS is loosely coupled because it is a client server paradigm.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
For any component to qualify as either Interprocess or intraprocess do they both have to be container managed meaning running in a server ?
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, 18:13 Andy McCright, <j.andrew.mccright@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Both CDI and EJBs are intra-process - they both work primarily within the same JVM.
EJBs have a remoting capability though I think that remote EJBs are being phased out (they are at least losing popularity to more web-based remoting mechansims like REST, GraphQL, etc.).
Hope this helps,
Andy
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:08 PM Som Lima <somplasticllc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi cdi-devs,
Q1. Is an EJB bean , an EE component , an example of Interprocess ?
Q2 . Is CDI bean , an EE component , an example of intraprocess ?
Regards
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, 13:39 Som Lima, <somplasticllc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Q1. Can one refer to EJBs as Inter process ?
Q2. Can one refer to CDI as intra process ?
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, 08:23 Jan Supol, <jan.supol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No. While IPC communicates between processes within a single system, client-server communication is about communication between two remote systems.
The corner case of the usage of client-server API for IPC would have been highly ineffective, because of the TCP/IP communication involved.
-- Jan
From: jaxrs-dev <jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Som Lima <somplasticllc@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 5:53 AM
To: jaxrs developer discussions <jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [External] : Re: [jaxrs-dev] Question : another question ?
Is a client server API also referred to as inter process ?
I have been looking for a definitive answer to this question for more than fifteen years. This is a very important question for me.
Also Yes/No please if possible
Thank You.
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, 16:41 Markus KARG, <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes.
Von: jaxrs-dev [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Som Lima
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2021 23:26
An: jaxrs developer discussions
Betreff: Re: [jaxrs-dev] Question
Is JAX-RS a client server API ?
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, 22:24 Markus KARG, <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It seems you still do not understand the purpose of this mailing list. If you have a question on JAX-RS feel free to post it here. Otherwise I'd like to kindly ask you to not post off-topic. Thanks.
-Markus
Von: jaxrs-dev [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Som Lima
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2021 23:22
An: jaxrs developer discussions
Betreff: Re: [jaxrs-dev] Question
One client server API is same as another client server API.
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, 21:46 Markus KARG, <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I cannot see ANY relation to JAX-RS, actually, and I wonder what the intention is why you post this statement into the JAX-RS Developer Discussion forum?
-Markus
Von: jaxrs-dev [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Som Lima
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2021 19:35
An: jaxrs developer discussions
Betreff: Re: [jaxrs-dev] Question
Personally I think Java's Remote Method Invocation (RMI) compute engine was the best remote compute engine because of its language neutrality combined with its simplicity and everything else is second best.
I am not a decision maker , just an implementor of text parsers.
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, 15:29 Markus KARG, <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
it is not who is asking but what whether the topic is about making JAX-RS API better or not
-Markus
Von: jaxrs-dev [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Som Lima
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2021 00:24
An: jaxrs developer discussions
Betreff: Re: [jaxrs-dev] Question
So an Application Developer or System Architect questions are off topic.
They are considered lower class :)
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021, 17:24 Markus KARG, <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is the mailing list for contributors and committers to the Jakarta RESTful Web Services standard, so anything that targets in making the standard better is appropriate.
But you won't get punished for asking other questions, too. ;-)
In general please understand that product-specific questions are off-topic, and there are lots of better places for user questions, like e. g. Stack Overflow. :-)
-Markus
Von: jaxrs-dev [mailto:jaxrs-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Som Lima
Gesendet: Montag, 25. Januar 2021 20:57
An: jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [jaxrs-dev] Question
What kind of questions are appropriate to ask on this line ?
_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev