Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Relaxing signature testing

> On Mar 17, 2021, at 12:21 PM, Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 3/17/21 2:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>> The flip side is if this is actually adds capabilities desirable in well-known platforms like OSGi, maybe should create a standard annotation and officially add it to the API so everyone has it.
> This is the fundamental question, whether to ignore certain annotations that have no impact on compatibility.  This is also somewhat of a slippery slope as the annotation class could be enhanced in a way that does cause compatibility concerns, even if the annotation is a standard annotation.

I intended to say something very different than I think was understood.  When I say potentially making it a standard annotation what I mean is a new "jakarta.*" annotation defined in a spec and with signature tests.


-David

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Back to the top