[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Relaxing signature testing
|
> On Mar 17, 2021, at 12:21 PM, Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 3/17/21 2:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>> The flip side is if this is actually adds capabilities desirable in well-known platforms like OSGi, maybe should create a standard annotation and officially add it to the API so everyone has it.
> This is the fundamental question, whether to ignore certain annotations that have no impact on compatibility. This is also somewhat of a slippery slope as the annotation class could be enhanced in a way that does cause compatibility concerns, even if the annotation is a standard annotation.
I intended to say something very different than I think was understood. When I say potentially making it a standard annotation what I mean is a new "jakarta.*" annotation defined in a spec and with signature tests.
-David
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature