Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] [ejb-dev] Removal of tests for pruned technologies versus making tests optional and not run by default...

I started to document the Jakarta TCK rules [1] for removing TCK tests for removed technologies (like tests that specifically use Corba or the Corba IIOP protocol) and also for tests that use DTDs/Schemas older than EE 8.

I think it will help for EE 9 to have consistent rules that we follow for $subject. Feedback on [1] is welcome before it is merged into the Platform TCK documentation (perhaps via github pages or wiki).

Scott

[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rdQCftJHexDouNtrvvUfjknZHhG8sWt1lerwcWpbQrY/edit#heading=h.sygoumfn3qd0

On 9/29/20 12:38 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote:
As discussed today, I think consistency would be my choice.

I'll look at the impact in terms of TCK.



--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com <http://www.tomitribe.com/>


On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:36 PM Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    Hi,

    During the Platform call [1] today it was pointed out that TCKs should
    consistently handle all pruned/removed technologies the same (e.g.
    either remove related tests or allow related tests to be run
    optionally).

    We removed the Jakarta Platform EE TCK tests for Jakarta XML
    Registries,
    Jakarta XML RPC, Jakarta Deployment, Jakarta Management but recently
    updated the Platform TCK to treat the com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30 that use
    Corba as optional [2].  By default the EJB tests that use Corba are not
    run (default is !rmi_iiop&!corba ).

    I added David Belevins + the EJB ml to ask what the impact would be if
    we adjusted the changes made in [2] to instead remove the ejb30 tests
    that use Corba?

    We also updated the com/sun/ts/tests/rmiiiop tests to be optional as
    well [2].  By default these tests are not run (default is
    !rmi_iiop&!corba ).

    Feedback on removing the RMI-IIOP tests instead of marking them
    optional
    by default would also be appreciated.

    Thank you Guru for all of your hard work and patience on [2].

    Scott

    [1]
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EJ2ilaPhMnQqa3aw6AmwjRbBPGL3_np4uuwklgfqPZI/edit?pli=1

    [2] https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/pull/521

    _______________________________________________
    ejb-dev mailing list
    ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    To unsubscribe from this list, visit
    https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ejb-dev


_______________________________________________
ejb-dev mailing list
ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ejb-dev




Back to the top