+1
Regards,
Alwin
On 14/05/20 8:20 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
+1 to drop
the 8.0
branch
Create an
8.0.x
branch for ongoing maintenance, if or when needed.
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
From:
Scott
Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
05/14/2020
09:34
Subject:
[EXTERNAL]
[jakartaee-tck-dev] Proposal for dropping the 8.0 branch...
Sent
by: jakartaee-tck-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
As mentioned on
jakartaee-tck/pull/258
[1], the 8.0 branch is misleading, as it looks like further code
changes
are expected on 8.0, however, the only expected 8.0 activity is
to challenge
and possibly exclude tests for accepted challenges.
If no one disagrees with dropping
the
8.0 branch [2], we will delete it in a week.
Feedback is welcome, as always.
Feel free to simply vote with a +1 or -1, as well.
Thanks,
Scott
[1] https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/pull/258
[2] https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/tree/8.0_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
|