Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Fair rules for "optional" TCK compliance te

[Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>]

That does not make sense. Once removed from the platform, it is a vendor specific feature. It is up to them how they test that feature, and that can not be a requirement for certification.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:00 AM Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Correct.  Removed features can continue to be shipped and packaged with a compliant app server.  The TCK from the past release would still need to be executed and passed for these removed features.


---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:        Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdogdu@xxxxxxxxx>
To:        jakartaee-platform developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        07/02/2020 08:31
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Fair rules for "optional" TCK compliance tests (was: Inconsistency on the term "pruned")
Sent by:        jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

I thought we did away with the restriction that removed features cannot be shipped

IMHO, you can ship but when you ship, you need the pass the related TCK suite