Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] [POLL] Would you support the as-is javax JAXB and JAX-WS in your implementation
I would expect that a) is the route we would take.

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:00 AM David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
An informal poll for the implementations.  I think we might be all saying the same thing differently.

Let's say that Jakarta EE 9 doesn't "include" JAXB, JAX-WS or Activation, whatever "include" means.

Will you then:

 a) leave the `javax` versions of JAXB, JAX-WS, Activation in your future Jakarta EE 9 implementation
 b) put the work into removing `javax` versions of JAXB, JAX-WS, Activation and ship your future Jakarta EE 9 implementation without them


--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
310-633-3852

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev

Back to the top