The WildFly one was only filed an hour ago, not 14 days ago, so I
don't think lazy consensus works for that. But with enough +1
votes, maybe we can still get it approved. (I'm not at all clear on
what the rules are here.)
Kevin Sutter wrote on 9/9/19 1:39 PM:
Scott,
I just
reviewed
the Wildfly CR. Looks good overall. I had a few comments that
can easily be resolved (I hope).
It would be
great
to have three compatible implementations ready for tomorrow!
Can
we all review the Issues and add your +1 or comments. Although
the
two from Open Liberty and the one from Wildfly would pass the
lazy consensus
rule of 14 days... Barring any -1 votes, I hope we can provide
the
"accept" tag and get them on the list for tomorrow.
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
From:
Scott
Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
jakartaee-platform
developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
09/09/2019
09:18 PM
Subject:
[EXTERNAL]
Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Jakarta EE platform compatibility
certification
requests
Sent
by: jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Can we include WildFly 17.0.1.Final
(full
profile) as well?
Issue link is https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/issues/116
Thanks,
Scott
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019, 3:27 PM Bill
Shannon
<bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Lacking
any objections, I've marked all of these this approved by
lazy consensus.
Bill Shannon wrote on 9/3/19 1:41 PM:
> Just a reminder that we have several compatibility
certification requests
> filed for Eclipse GlassFish against the Jakarta EE
platform project
as
> part of the Jakarta EE 8 approval:
>
> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/issues/99
> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/issues/100
> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/issues/104
>
> These have all been open 14 days or more. I propose to
approve
and close
> them all on Friday, Sep 6, lacking any objections. Feel
free
to show your
> support by adding a +1 to the issue.
>
>
> In addition, we have a compatibility certification
request filed for
> Open Liberty against the Jakarta EE 8 full platform:
>
> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-platform/issues/114
>
> The request is not yet complete, but you might want to
start
> looking at it and be prepared to approve it by Monday,
Sep 9.
>
> Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
> jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev
>
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev
|