Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [jstl-dev] Fwd: [EXTERNAL] Re: Could one of the Specification Committee members please promote the following (Jakarta EE 10) TCK service releases...
Hi,

The release should be easy. It's running this job:

https://ci.eclipse.org/jstl/job/1_jstl-api-build-and-stage

That one will build the API jar and stages it. If it's fine in staging, you can release it to central using:

https://ci.eclipse.org/jstl/job/3_jstl-staging-to-release

For that you need the staging ID, which if you look carefully can be fetched from the logs of the first job.

Hope this helps!

Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms




On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 at 15:16, Paul Nicolucci via jstl-dev <jstl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

I completed this work a few months ago: https://github.com/jakartaee/tags/pull/254.

The release needs to be done and I talked with Arjan about doing this and he said he could help.

Regards,

Paul Nicolucci 

On Sat, Jul 13, 2024, 8:26 AM Scott Marlow via jstl-dev <jstl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Forward to Tags ml as fyi...

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ed Burns via jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, Jul 12, 2024, 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [EXTERNAL] Re: Could one of the Specification Committee members please promote the following (Jakarta EE 10) TCK service releases...
To: Jared Anderson <jhanders@xxxxxxxxxx>, jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ed Burns <Edward.Burns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


That seems logical to me but:

 

  1. Who would be responsible for making this change?
  2. What other related work must be done?

Thanks,

 

Ed

 

From: Jared Anderson <jhanders@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, July 12, 2024 at 18:36
To: jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ed Burns <Edward.Burns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] Could one of the Specification Committee members please promote the following (Jakarta EE 10) TCK service releases...

Would it be sufficient to create a 3.0.1 service release for tags to expand the range for the OSGi Import for _expression_ language and pages?

 

Updating from:

 

Import-Package: jakarta.el;version="[5.0,6)",jakarta.servlet;version="[6.0,7)",jakarta.servlet.http;version="[6.0,7)",jakarta.servlet.jsp;version="[3.1,4)",jakarta.servlet.jsp.jstl.core,jakarta.servlet.jsp.tagext;version="[3.1,4)",javax.xml.parsers,org.xml.sax,org.xml.sax.helpers

 

to:

 

Import-Package: jakarta.el;version="[5.0,7)",jakarta.servlet;version="[6.0,7)",jakarta.servlet.http;version="[6.0,7)",jakarta.servlet.jsp;version="[3.1,5)",jakarta.servlet.jsp.jstl.core,jakarta.servlet.jsp.tagext;version="[3.1,5)",javax.xml.parsers,org.xml.sax,org.xml.sax.helpers

 

 

Jared Anderson

WebSphere Jakarta delivery lead

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Ed Burns via jakarta.ee-spec <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reply-To: Jakarta specification discussions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To: Jakarta specification discussions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [EXTERNAL] Could one of the Specification Committee members please promote the following (Jakarta EE 10) TCK service releases...

Date: 07/12/2024 05:22:50 PM

 

Also related to tags is JEA-242. I have not followed this closely enough to be able to easily tell if the following is done. Can someone confirm if it is? From the above issue: Players Pages 4. 0 depends on EL 6 M1 Tags 3. 0 (JSTL) depends on

Also related to tags is JEA-242.

I have not followed this closely enough to be able to easily tell if the following is done. Can someone confirm if it is?  From the above issue:

  • Players
    • Pages 4.0 depends on EL 6 M1
    • Tags 3.0 (JSTL) depends on EL 5 M1
  • Problem
    • We cannot have this mismatch due to OSGi.
  • Proposed resolution
    • Do a Tags 3.1 which increases the dependency on EL to be 6 M1.
    • This requires specification committee action to approve the release, even if the only thing changing is incrementing the EL dependency level.
  • Timeframe: target this to Milestone 2.

 

Bottom line: @arjan.tijms  will take the necessary actions to push this through for M1 and we will do the process work to do the right thing for M2.

Thanks,

Ed

_______________________________________________

jakarta.ee-spec mailing list

To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
_______________________________________________
jstl-dev mailing list
jstl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jstl-dev
_______________________________________________
jstl-dev mailing list
jstl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jstl-dev

Back to the top