Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 14:33:11 -0400
Delivered-to: iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/iot-wg>
List-help: <mailto:iot-wg-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg>, <mailto:iot-wg-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/iot-wg>, <mailto:iot-wg-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

On 13/05/2014 4:20 PM, Carrer, Marco wrote:

It would certainly be interesting to explore how to combine these two technologies in a single solution.

The technical details of this thread are far beyond my limited knowledge. But I can say that a common provisioning story across the Java projects in IoT would certainly be Very Good Thing.

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)

References:
- [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Pascal Rapicault
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Jens Reimann
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Pascal Rapicault
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Jens Reimann
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Pascal Rapicault
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Kai Kreuzer
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Pascal Rapicault
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Kai Kreuzer
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Carrer, Marco

Prev by Date: Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
Next by Date: [iot-wg] dc-square would like to join the IoT WG
Previous by thread: Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
Next by thread: Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs