Hi Jens,
- Good point. I changed it already on the web site
- The incubator branding (incubator egg) is shown in the
footer of the webpage , see https://www.eclipse.org/vorto . I hope that’s enough
😊
We are in the middle of discussions internally for onboarding a few more committers to the project. In any case, with your support, I will be preparing a 1.0 release of the project, coming this year. IMO, a 1.0
will definitely create more awareness among the community and eventually motivate people to starting to use it.
Cheers, Alex
From: <iot-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jens Reimann <jreimann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: PMC list for IoT top level project <iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 6 September 2019 at 3:06 PM
To: PMC list for IoT top level project <iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [iot-pmc] Eclipse Vorto 0.12 Release
Hi Jens,
-
Wouldn’t users need to subscribe to the mailing list first, before their mail gets through to us ? In this case, we would need to mention this somewhere there. Or you have a better idea ?
So yes, you need to subscribe, but I don't see a problem there. Having a corporate e-mail address for an open source project seems kind of weird. Just ask yourself the question, would you hand out control over that e-mail address to a committer
coming from another company? If the answer is no, then I think you need to change it.
-
-
Funny you are asking coz I was planning to do a 1.0 release by end of this year. What kinda makes me hesitate though is the fact, that I am the only committer on this project ,but that shouldn’t stand in the way right ? In any case, this project is widely used
within the Bosch organization and a core part of the Bosch IoT Suite, and I keep getting this question, when a 1.0 comes out
😊 I guess it’s time for it now.
That actually brings up a third point, one that I did overlook, and which blocks a +1 … the web page is missing the incubation branding [1].
I think having a 1.0 version is ok. But in this case project graduation might be a different story. Taking a look at your contributors, I see regular contributors to the project. So maybe it makes sense to convince them to become committers,
and grow he committer base. (Having a more neutral e-mail might help here as well ;-) ).
Thanks for your feedback.
Cheers, Alex
I have two quick questions, nothing preventing a +1 for a release from my perspective. But maybe the right time to check:
1) Looking at the vorto page, I see a the location information of "11 Bishan Street 21 Singapore" and a contact e-mail address of "vorto-development@xxxxxxxxxxxx".
As this is an Eclipse project, I would expect the Vorto mailing list address, and the Eclipse Foundation headquarter address instead.
2) You have a specification for Vortolang 1.0 … However Vorto is "still" 0.12. Now I do understand to have different versions for different components. The question would be: what
prevents you from doing a 1.0 release of Vorto?
--
Jens Reimann
Principal Software Engineer / EMEA ENG Middleware
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14
85630 Grasbrunn
Germany
phone: +49 89 2050 71286
_____________________________________________________________________________
Red Hat GmbH, www.de.redhat.com,
Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Tom Savage, Michael O'Neill
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
--
Jens Reimann
Principal Software Engineer / EMEA ENG Middleware
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14
85630 Grasbrunn
Germany
phone: +49 89 2050 71286
_____________________________________________________________________________
Red Hat GmbH, www.de.redhat.com,
Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Tom Savage, Michael O'Neill
|