Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [iot-pmc] Latest CQ Question

So, should we ask them to close the existing CQs and open a single CQ with all dependencies or process the existing CQs and advise them to use a single CQ in the future?

 

--Dave

 

 

From: <iot-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jens Reimann <jreimann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: PMC list for IoT top level project <iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, November 26, 2018 at 11:49 PM
To: PMC list for IoT top level project <iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [iot-pmc] Latest CQ Question

 

Yes, I think they go all go in one big CQ.

 

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:52 AM Woodard, David <david.woodard@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello fellow CQ members,

 

It appears the majority of open CQs are for IO Fog (Node JS libraries) and Hawkbit (Spring v5.1.2 libraries). Should these requests be grouped into a single CQ? Maybe this doesn’t make sense for Spring, but I would think the Node JS libraries should fall under the _javascript_ umbrella. Let me know what you think. If they need to be processed individually, I will block out some time tomorrow to go through them.

 

Thanks,

--Dave

 

_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc



--

Jens Reimann
Senior Software Engineer / EMEA ENG Middleware
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14
85630 Grasbrunn
Germany
phone: +49 89 2050 71286
_____________________________________________________________________________

Red Hat GmbH, www.de.redhat.com,
Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill


Back to the top