| Re: [henshin-dev] question about graph transformation in Henshin |
Am 15.12.2011 15:40, schrieb sih:
> Dear Stefan,
> i think it's Christian who has answered my question before.
>
> now i repeat the question:
> 1. Christian said right now the henshin doesn't support importing UML
> profiles, but only metamodels (ecore files). so i asked if i add
> stereotypes in the UML.ecore file will be the same as the profile
> applied to the UML model i use.
If the modified UML.ecore model has elements that represent stereotypes,
Henshin can use them in a transformation.
However, the approach is different to what the MDT UML team has provide,
i.e., its obviously not the same. In the end its a matter of how you
treat the resulting models.
>
> 2. the transformation function seems not as mature as AGG. so i
> wonder when can this be ready for use.
What is your understanding of a "mature" function? Generally the henshin
transformation work very well so far.
>
> regards,
> fenglin han
>
>
> On 15.12.2011 13:58, Stefan Jurack wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> sorry, I am not sure that I understand your question. And with whom
>> ("... i have got confirmed from one of you..") have you been talking
>> already?
>>
>> Regards, Stefan
>>
>>
>> Am 14.12.2011 15:52, schrieb sih:
>>> Dear Henshin Developer,
>>> i am using Henshin for UML based building block refactoring.
>>> i have too question about the current Henshin:
>>>
>>> Our model is mainly UML models (2.x or above) with a profile
>>> applied.
>>>
>>> 1. for transformation purpose, i think i need to add the
>>> stereotype in the UML ecore file to create a unique meta-model for my
>>> models, (since i have got confirmed from one of you, saying that
>>> henshin right now doesn't support profile mechanisms). will
>>> that have the same effect as profile to UML ecore file?
>>> or i ask in another way, will the transformation recognize the
>>> stereotypes applied to model by profiles after i use the meta-model
>>> created by adding the profile elements to UML ecore?
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. I looked at the bank example before, but it seems can only
>>> work in specific configured rules. when can the general
>>> transformation function ready?
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks for your reply in advance, and happy Xmas to you all!
>>>
>>>
>>> yours sincerely,
>>>
>>> Fenglin Han
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> henshin-dev mailing list
>>> henshin-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/henshin-dev
>>
>
>
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature