Thanks Mike.
On 21 Nov 2012, at 13:08, michael keith wrote: Ah, sorry. I thought you had been agreeing with that. I don't think we need consensus amongst all of us, as long as people know what is involved, and everybody does, now. The minutes have been updated accordingly. Thanks, -Mike On 20/11/2012 10:49 PM, Glyn Normington wrote: Hi Mike
"Decision that we will not accept pull requests. We'll direct contributors to the bug reporter instead" is not quite right. That sounds like your decision, but I'm still happy to accept pull requests (but handled in the way I explained to Wayne) in conjunction with comments on bugzilla, as this avoids the bother of attaching patches for the contributor and lets me choose how much context to view around the code change.
Would you like to discuss this further to come to a consensus on the approach across Gemini sub-projects or are you happy to allow some variation? I presume the latter.
Regards,
Glyn
----- Original Message -----
From: "michael keith"<michael.keith@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Gemini Developer List"<gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 20 November, 2012 5:30:13 PM
Subject: [gemini-dev] Minutes of Gemini mtg Nov 20, 2012
Minutes are on the wiki:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Gemini/Meetings/Minutes_Nov_20_2012
Please let me know if there are errors or omissions.
Thanks,
-Mike
_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
_______________________________________________
gemini-dev mailing list
gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev
|
