> <mailto:
wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> If Zest has different release numbers and a different schedule from GEF,
> does it make more sense for it to be a separate project? Just askin'
>
> Wayne
>
> On 02/10/2011 04:33 PM, Alexander Nyßen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > what about the option to deliver Zest 1.x together with GEF 3.7 for
> > Indigo and to come up with a Zest 2.0 & Draw2d/GEF 4.0 combination in
> > 2012? I think there are a couple of things in Draw2d/GEF that could be
> > cleaned up as well, and doing so would give us the chance to better
> > align the three components with each other (I haven't taken a look
> into
> > Zest 2.0 yet, but Zest 1.x e.g. had to "fork" XYScaledGraphics, which
> > could be merged back into ScaledGraphics; I suppose there are similar
> > places in Zest 2.0). What do you think?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Alexander
> >
> > Am 10.02.2011 um 19:52 schrieb Ian Bull:
> >
> >> I will look at those...
> >>
> >> Just to be clear, we don't need to break existing users... we can
> ship
> >> Zest 2.0 and Zest 1.x... we can also not put Zest 2.0 in the indigo
> >> repo.
> >>
> >> But I will review the plan.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> ian
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Anthony Hunter
> <
anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx>