Re: [gef-dev] Common Command Infrastructure

[Randy Hudson <hudsonr@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The most likely thing to happen is to
keep using GEF commands and provide a CommandStack implementation which
wraps command in an operation, and delegates to an operation history instance.
 This was technically possible for 3.1, but we didn't feel that the
operation framework was stable enough during the 3.1 dev cycle to spend
time working on this type of bridge.

What do you think of this type of solution?
 If any clients are already implementing such a command stack on top
of 3.1, we would appreciate the contributino.

-Randy

Pratik Shah/Durham/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: gef-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/09/2005 10:01 AM

Please respond to
GEF development

To	GEF development <gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx, gef-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject	Re: [gef-dev] Common Command Infrastructure

Gunnar, 

We will be considering it for 3.2.  However, since we have to maintain
backward-compatibility, we can't just dump our current method.  Unless
we find a suitable common ground, this probably won't happen for 3.2.  We'll
keep the community updated on this issue. 

Pratik Shah
Graphical Editing Framework (GEF)
http://www.eclipse.org/gef
Ph: (919) 254-5043
Fx: (919) 254-8169

"Gunnar Wagenknecht" <G.Wagenknecht@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: gef-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/09/2005 01:58 AM

Please respond to
GEF development

To	<gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[gef-dev] Common Command Infrastructure

Hi!

Is the GEF team planning to adopt the new commond command infrastructure
in 3.2?

Cu, Gunnar


_______________________________________________
gef-dev mailing list
gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gef-dev
_______________________________________________
gef-dev mailing list
gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gef-dev