|
Makes sense to me
On 3/1/2016 8:49 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
Right now the equinox
project has the following
sub-projects, each with their own committer groups
rt.equinox - parent project, no
real
code here, but it does contain the website
rt.equinox.framework - where the
OSGi
framework and Equinox native launcher lives
rt.equinox.bundles - where
everything
else is, besides p2
rt.equinox.p2 - where p2 is
I plan to request the foundation
fold
rt.equinox.framework and rt.equinox.bundles into the parent
project rt.equinox.
I do not think there is a need to separate committers of the
various
equinox bundles from committers of the framework/launcher or the
website.
I do not plan to request p2 be folded into rt.equinox unless
the
existing p2 community of committers request that to happen. p2
is
a fairly large codebase so it makes sense to keep it separate if
the committers
want that. But the rest of Equinox is not that large and
maintaining
3 separate committer groups is not worth it in my opinion.
Committers, please voice your
concerns
if you have them.
Tom
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
|
