[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox Subprojects
|
In my experience this creates quite a bit
of non-trivial additional management overhead to have an independent project.
When Equinox was split out of Platform it created a major ongoing effort
of separate release reviews, plans, release train checklists, ip logs,
etc. If someone wants to do it, knock yourself out ;) I really don't see
a problem with the status quo, apart from the obvious equinox security
component that needs to be terminated (code was already moved into rt.equinox.bundles).
John
From:
Pascal Rapicault <pascal.rapicault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Equinox development
mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:
12/07/2012 02:25 PM
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev]
Equinox Subprojects
Sent by:
equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Just to be clear, I’m not
pushing for this to happen. That was just a thought triggered from Wayne’s
comment.
From: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Thomas Watson
Sent: December-07-12 2:17 PM
To: Equinox development mailing list
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox Subprojects
Whatever is currently in the rt.equinox.p2
repo stays with the p2 project IMO ;-)
Personally I don't see the advantage of making p2 a separate project under
RT, but if the p2 leads want to do it it is fine by me. I don't think
it will give you any more freedom than you have today.
Tom
Ian
Bull ---12/07/2012 12:02:08 PM---I certainly wouldn't be opposed to making
p2 its own project, but how much extra overhead in involve
From: Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 12/07/2012 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox Subprojects
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
I certainly wouldn't be opposed to making p2 its own project, but how much
extra overhead in involved (managerial -- release, docware, etc...
and technical -- builds, platform contribution, etc..)? Also,
there are a few components (simple configurator for example), which are
kinda p2 and kinda platform and sorta equinox. I guess Pascal and Tom would
have a good idea of where to place these things (they're in p2 right now).
cheers,
ian
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Am 06.12.2012 23:46, schrieb Pascal
Rapicault:
Another solution is to make p2
a project in of itself.
That's what I was thinking.
-Gunnar
--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://wagenknecht.org/
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com
| http://twitter.com/eclipsesource_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
