Re: [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite

From: Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:09:24 -0400
Delivered-to: equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/equinox-dev>
List-help: <mailto:equinox-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev>, <mailto:equinox-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/equinox-dev>, <mailto:equinox-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On roughly the same topic (handling of storage & configuration) I was wondering during such a re-factor if it might be possible to provide for alternative implementations of FrameworkAdaptor as opposed to the currently hard wired BaseAdaptor.

I think this may provide the necessary avenue for changing any behaviors of storage or configuration handling by third parties.

Thoughts?

--
Raymond Augé | Senior Software Architect | Liferay, Inc.

---

8-9 October 2012 | Liferay North America Symposium | liferay.com/northamerica2012

16-17 October 2012 | Liferay Europe Symposium | liferay.com/europe2012

24-25 October 2012 | Liferay Spain Symposium | liferay.com/spain2012

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite
  - From: Thomas Watson

References:
- [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite
  - From: Pascal Rapicault
- Re: [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite
  - From: Thomas Watson
- Re: [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite
  - From: Pascal Rapicault
- Re: [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite
  - From: Thomas Watson

Prev by Date: Re: [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite
Next by Date: Re: [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite
Previous by thread: Re: [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite
Next by thread: Re: [equinox-dev] About the fwk rewrite
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs