Yes, we could use FrameworkEvent.STARTED, but only if we are
sure that we listen for this event when it is fired. If the code, which listens
for it, is executed after the framework is started, then it will never get the
event. This happens in an Activator of a bundle – it may be executed during the
initial start of the framework, or after the framework is started (for example
on the first start of the bundle after installing it). Therefore we need to be
able to check the framework state in one and the same way in both cases.
Regards,
Lazar Kirchev
From:
equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Thomas Watson
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:30 PM
To: Equinox development mailing list
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Starting the system bundle
Yes, you should use the FrameworkEvent.STARTED
event for this. You should probably open a bug so we can investigate the
current behavior anyway to see if the comment is valid.
Tom
BJ Hargrave---04/14/2010 08:14:37 AM---We don't you just
wait for the FrameworkEvent.STARTED event?
From:
|
BJ Hargrave/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
|
To:
|
Equinox development mailing list
<equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Date:
|
04/14/2010 08:14 AM
|
Subject:
|
Re: [equinox-dev] Starting the system bundle
|
We don't you just wait for the FrameworkEvent.STARTED event?
* This event is fired when the Framework has
started after all installed
* bundles that are marked to be started have
been started and the Framework
* has reached the initial start level. The
source of this event is the
* System Bundle.
--
From:
|
"Kirchev, Lazar"
<l.kirchev@xxxxxxx>
|
To:
|
"equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
Date:
|
2010/04/14 08:21
|
Subject:
|
[equinox-dev] Starting the
system bundle
|
Sent by:
|
equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
Hello,
We are implementing logic which depends on the system bundle being put in
ACTIVE state after all bundles, which should be running, are started. However,
it turned out that actually the system bundle is put in ACTIVE state just
before the bundles are started. This is evident from the method StartLevelManager.doSetStartLevel(…), which is called from the EquinoxLauncher. There is a comment in the code, that
putting the bundle in ACTIVE state “should be done just before firing the
STARTED event for the system bundle” but is done earlier, because “some depend
on the system bundle being in the ACTIVE state when they are starting”. Do
you think it is possible to change the current behavior and put the system
bundle in ACTIVE state after the other bundles are started, as it is in the
OSGi spec?
Kind regards,
Lazar Kirchev_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev