Re: [equinox-dev] jetty-http / jsp / problem with session-scoped beans

[Yuriy Malchenko <jmalchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

Alex,

thanks for a quick response.

I guess I'll just be keeping this in mind as a feature. Dropping all
sessions indeed sounds unreasonable (especially having other bundles
with own resources and sessions).

---
Yurique



On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 3 Mar 2010, at 00:51, Yuriy Malchenko wrote:
>
>> Or maybe I should take the needed classes (session/application scoped)
>> to a separate bundle which will not be needed to update frequently?
>> But anyway sometimes it might, so it's not a good solution.
>
> It's generally a good idea to separate out interfaces/classes which are going to be exposed to the end user and make them available in a separate bundle, whilst having your logic/program in a different bundle. Then you can throw away the program and reinstantiate it after update, but keep your data objects/interfaces the same.
>
> Note that applies to a number of other cases where the implementation must be bounced but whilst maintaining the same interface classes; it's not unique to servlets or JSPs, though of course, you notice these in situations like this.
>
> The other approach is to drop all sessions when you reload the code, which doesn't sound like a sensible solution.
>
> Alex_______________________________________________
> equinox-dev mailing list
> equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>