[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [equinox-dev] Is this a bug?
|
Such behavior is not spec'ed, but I think every OSGi implementation
supports some form of reference installation.
BR,
--
Danail Nachev
Senior Software Engineer/Development Tools
ProSyst Labs EOOD
-------------------------------------------------
stay in touch with your product.
-------------------------------------------------
Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> 2008/9/24 Niclas Hedhman <niclas@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:niclas@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Danail Nachev <d.nachev@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:d.nachev@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> If bundles are installed by reference (via reference: URL) Equinox
> doesn't guarantee anything to bundles which you replace, while
> they are
> still running. Although OSGi is considered dynamic, such
> scenarios are
> not supported. AFAIK, p2 and old Eclipse Update installs all
> bundles by
> reference.
>
> Such scenarios can be supported if the bundle was copied to the
> Equinox
> storage and not referenced. Bundles which are installed through
> Bundle.installBundle(String, InputStream) and
> Bundle.installBundle(String) are copied (unless the URL passed
> to the
> installBundle(String) is reference: URL) are copied to the storage.
>
>
> I find this behavior interesting... Is this behavior supported by
> the specification explicitly, or does it just not cover it??
>
>
> I couldn't find any explicit mention in the spec, but FWIW we also
> support the reference: scheme in Felix
>
> Cheers
> Niclas
> _______________________________________________
> equinox-dev mailing list
> equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> equinox-dev mailing list
> equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
