[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [equinox-dev] Code move timeline
|
Yes we will retain history. We do not plan to physically remove the old tags and branches from the /cvsroot/eclipse repo so the old map files should continue to be able to build the maintenance builds. I think we will remove all the content from HEAD and place a readme in each project stating where the project has moved. But this does not imply that the old tags and branches will be deleted.
But this does raise the question about which repository should be used for 3.4.x. Which repo should we use to develop 3.4.x? My vote is to do all future releases out of the Runtime repo, including point releases (3.4.1). In this case the 3.4.x map files should only have to be updated with the new location when the first fix is dropped into the new Runtime repo.
Tom
Kim Moir ---07/17/2008 04:06:46 PM---So I assume that the cvs history will be retained when the bundles are moved to the RT project's re
From: |
Kim Moir <Kim_Moir@xxxxxxxxxx> |
To: |
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
07/17/2008 04:06 PM |
Subject: |
Re: [equinox-dev] Code move timeline |
So I assume that the cvs history will be retained when the bundles are moved to the RT project's repository? The 3.4.x map files will need to be updated with the new location too so we don't have build breakage....
Kim
Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
07/17/2008 02:04 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To | Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
cc | |
Subject | Re: [equinox-dev] Code move timeline |
|
We discussed this at the Tuesday Equinox call. It looks like a large part of the team will be on vacation at the end of July. The proposal is to move the equinox projects to RT during the week of July 28th.
We also discussed what to do with the equinox incubator. At this time we are going to wait for the new Eclipse Development Process to be approved (hopefully in August). The new process should allow us to create incubator projects under any project in Eclipse. This will allow us to create an incubator project for equinox directly under the equinox project in RT.
Jeff and I have been discussing the layout of the different components of Equinox. Today we have Bundles, Framework, p2, Security. The Bundles category has become kind of a dumping ground for many unrelated bundles. We would like to split these bundles out into three categories:
osgi-compendium - All bundles that implement one of the osgi compendium specifications. This includes the following projects:
org.eclipse.equinox.app
org.eclipse.equinox.cm
org.eclipse.equinox.device
org.eclipse.equinox.ds
org.eclipse.equinox.event
org.eclipse.equinox.http
org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty (jetty5 and jetty6 impls)
org.eclipse.equinox.io
org.eclipse.equinox.ip
org.eclipse.equinox.log
org.eclipse.equinox.metatype
org.eclipse.equinox.preferences
org.eclipse.equinox.useradmin
org.eclipse.equinox.util
org.eclipse.equinox.wireadmin
org.eclipse.osgi.services
org.eclipse.osgi.util
components - The bundles that provide infrastructure to developing components in Equinox. This includes the following projects:
org.eclipse.equinox.common
org.eclipse.equinox.registry
org.eclipse.equinox.transforms.hook
org.eclipse.equinox.transforms.xslt
server-side - The server side bundles.
org.eclipse.equinox.http.registry
org.eclipse.equinox.http.servlet
org.eclipse.equinox.http.servletbridge
org.eclipse.equinox.jsp.jasper
org.eclipse.equinox.jsp.jasper.registry
org.eclipse.equinox.servletbridge
This would result in the following CVS structure in RT
org.eclipse.equinox/components
org.eclipse.equinox/framework
org.eclipse.equinox/osgi-compendium
org.eclipse.equinox/p2
org.eclipse.equinox/security
org.eclipse.equinox/server-side
All commiters with rights to the projects contained in Bundles will continue to have access to all the projects which got moved to the three new categories. We are not trying to create more fine grained commit rights. Instead we are just trying to create a layout that makes sense in CVS and Bugzilla. Thoughts?
Tom
Pascal Rapicault ---07/15/2008 10:18:13 AM---Hi, I would like to know what is the time line for moving the equinox code into
From: |
Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx> |
To: |
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
07/15/2008 10:18 AM |
Subject: |
[equinox-dev] Code move timeline |
Hi,
I would like to know what is the time line for moving the equinox code into the runtime repository?
PaScaL_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev