RE: [equinox-dev] Time for a p2 list?

[John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>]

+1

I would read both anyway so it makes
no difference to me. But since there is clearly a demand for the separation,
I don't see why not. 

John

"Haigermoser, Helmut" <Helmut.Haigermoser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/07/2008 06:36 AM

Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Equinox development mailing list" <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [equinox-dev] Time for a p2 list?

+1 

-----Original Message-----
From: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
Sent: 06 July 2008 17:47
To: Equinox development mailing list
Subject: [equinox-dev] Time for a p2 list?

Hey guys,
 
I'm seeing a solid amount of traffic for each of the OSGi and p2
interests on this list. I care less about OSGi and care a lot about p2.
I've started filtering by hand but I'm afraid of missing p2 messages. Is
it time to start a p2-dev list?
 
Cheers,
Doug.
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev