[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [equinox-dev] [p2] ECF bundles not up to date in M6
|
Hi DJ,
Thanks for the explanation. If there is something I can do for future
to prevent the replication not happening in time (e.g. put stuff on
download.eclipse.org by a certain time on Monday, please let me know).
RE: the 'patch' problem. I imagine ECF won't be the only ones facing
this issue...so do let the community know if there is something to work
on here (is there a bug(s) associated with this?).
Thanks,
Scott
DJ Houghton wrote:
Scott, the problem with the ECF JARs earlier this week was that they hadn't
replicated to our local servers here. So when people (Kim/Pascal) accessed
the URLs for the JARs from home it was all good but when the build machine
tried, it was redirected to a local machine which didn't have the JARs yet.
The easiest fix at the time was to revert our contribution to the one from
the previous map file so that's what I did. Like Pascal mentions, we will
look into moving up to the new versions.
The idea of dropping higher versions of bundles into your dropins folder is
referred to around here at the "patch" problem. It is on the list but it is
not implemented yet. Currently the workaround is to either use the same
bundle versions when exporting, or update the bundle.info file manually
with the correct information.
equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 04/02/2008 12:46:33 AM:
Hi Pascal,
Strange...as I'm quite certain I checked 3/31 afternoon that the jars
referenced in this map
http://download.eclipse.org/technology/ecf/integration/ecf.filetransfer.map
were replicated OK. Even so, this was after M6 build (sunday) anyway.
But this brings up a question for us: If people use the dropins and/or
plugins directory install, and they put a newer version of a plugin that
already exists/is installed as part of platform, what happens? Bad
things/is this to be avoided? or can it be safely done?
Thanks,
Scott
Pascal Rapicault wrote:
I'm sorry about the problems this can cause the ECF users, however we
tried
moving to this most recent build but as you can see, it failed finding
the
jars on the server during the build
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/platform-releng-dev/msg11579.html
In case of a rebuild we will be looking into addressing this.
From: Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Equinox development mailing list <equinox-
dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 04/01/2008 09:38 PM
Subject: [equinox-dev] [p2] ECF bundles not up to date in M6
Howday p2'ers,
The M6 release of Eclipse/p2 seems to have used a relatively old
integration build of the 4 ECF bundles (i.e. they have qualifier
v20080317-0809 rather than the 20080324 integration build as I expected
from this bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=219499
This is not tragic, but it causes us a little bit of consternation
because there were some very small API additions for ECF filetransfer
during the week of the 17th, and these obviously didn't get into M6 of
platform.
This means that the next milestone of ECF will include these small API
additions...and I wanted to let everyone know this doesn't constitute
an
API freeze breach...as ECF's filetransfer bundles are frozen at this
point (but M6 of platform didn't get these additions during week of
24th).
Thanks,
Scott
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev