[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] Ruminations on IDirector vs. ProvisioningHelper-like entity
|
Sounds good. So if we can have an Oracle that returns a
ProvisioningDeltaDescription or whatnot that describes the various
actions that would be performed. By having this as another object, we
can provide additional services to help describe in a human-readable
format the operation as well as in machine-understable styles to allow
serialization. What would the input to such a function be? Would you
still use a full Profile or would you use a ProfileDescription object
that can be accessed off of a Profile? Having it as a separate object
may also again further user-understandable descriptions of the
interface.
Tim
On 8/14/07, Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If only we could have a console as a UI... I'm really amazed by the
requirements the UI put ;-)
I agree that it is interesting / mandatory to be able to show disk space
and things like that, however ProvisioningOperand is wrong thing to base a
UI on since it contains the information to drive an engine and this will
likely be more detailed than what we have now (Simon is working on a new
API for the engine).
As for the code code, the oracle I have in mind will share code with the
director to ensure consistency.
"Tim Webb"
<tim@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: To
equinox-dev-bounc "Equinox development mailing list"
es@xxxxxxxxxxx <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
cc
08/14/2007 05:32 Subject
PM Re: [equinox-dev] [prov]
Ruminations on IDirector vs.
ProvisioningHelper-like entity
Please respond to
Equinox
development
mailing list
<equinox-dev@ecli
pse.org>
Pascal,
I could see a benefit to knowing the full set of operations since some
users don't want their system changed without understanding the impact.
More importantly, it is interesting to be able to show users information
such as the amount of data that will be downloaded as a result of X, being
able to calculate needed disk space before performing the operation, and
letting the user know that selecting that one little feature caused 200mb
of extra stuff to be included.
The issue I see is that a lot of the interesting information ends up
following many of the same paths that are currently used in the Director.
Instead of duplicating that code into another object called an Oracle,
might it make sense to pull some of that logic out of the Director into a
shared object? Whether it's called an Oracle or not, I think there should
be one set of code that determines the set of operations to be performed,
and I don't believe that we need to duplicate that logic.
Thoughts?
Tim
On 8/14/07, Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
Susan,
It seems to me that what you are after if some kind of "oracle" who given
a
profile, a bunch of IUs selected by the user, and repos would be able to
tell which IU can be added to the profile.
Unfortunately the "oracle" is not implemented. but something could
probably
be done quickly based on the code available in the director.
Also would you want to show to the end user what will happen?
PaScaL
Susan M Franklin
<
susan_franklin@u
s.ibm.com >
To
Sent by: Equinox development mailing list
equinox-dev-bounc <
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
es@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
08/14/2007 03:46 Re: [equinox-dev] [prov]
PM Ruminations on IDirector vs.
ProvisioningHelper-like entity
Please respond to
Equinox
development
mailing list
<
equinox-dev@ecli
pse.org>
Tim,
I have the same concerns/questions as you pose here, you are just a day
or
so ahead of me....I am beginning to work on the UI that follows more of
an
update manager workflow in Eclipse. The admin UI in M1 forced you to
locate the IU you wanted and then select a profile. The more typical use
case, where you are looking to install/update from your profile, is my
next
task. I've had the same low level concern (but had not yet investigated
the code thoroughly) that you have to ask the code to do something before
you can know what will be done. I was wondering if the fact that you get
pre and post notification events was going to help me, but I don't think
it
will.
So I'm hoping Pascal or someone can elaborate on this issue, as I'm about
to face it myself and will have more to contribute to this conversation
in
a day or so....
>Currently the IDirector interface has two methods : install and
uninstall.
In looking through the code of ProvisioningHelper and IDirector
(SimpleDirector) I'm not sure as to the right way to >describe to the
user
the series of operations that would be performed in installing software X
prior to actually initiating the installation. I could duplicate similar
code to what is found in >SimpleDirector using the ProfileInstallRegistry
and DependencyExpander to determine what would be required
susan_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
