Re: [equinox-dev] new services

[Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not stuck on the name.  alternatives
would be greatly appreciated.  Note that there are others like .ds,
.scr, .. that are not immediately obvious.  That is the nature of
acronyms.  We can go for full descriptive names.  I tend to shy
away from partial shortenings if possible.  decserv just grates.  initprov
is not so bad I guess.  But one has to wonder what we are saving over
full names.

Anyway, like I said, I'm open to suggestions.
 Remember that in general we have a policy of coordinating the bundle
name and the "dominant package" name.  That is, whatever
bundle name we choose will likely be reflected in various ways in the package
names.

Jeff

Niclas Hedhman <niclas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/20/2007 09:52 PM

Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [equinox-dev] new services

On Friday 20 April 2007 04:54, Alex Blewitt wrote:

> The point is, clear to you is not clear to me :-) I would have guessed
> internet protocol, followed by intellectual property. I wouldn't ever
> make the leap to provisioning, or whatever it is that it stands for.

 +1


Cheers
Niclas
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev