RE: [equinox-dev] Footprint of equinox

["John Wells" <jwells@xxxxxxx>]

I wondered this myself.  We've got some of our stuff running on a "slug"
so obviously it is small enough for that, but it sure would be great to
have it take up even less space on devices like that! 

John Wells (Aziz)
jwells@bea.comNOSPAM


-----Original Message-----
From: equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:equinox-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ?? ??
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 1:51 PM
To: equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [equinox-dev] Footprint of equinox

Knopflerfish  2.0.0 RC1, which seems compliant to OSGi Spec R4, was
released in May. http://www.knopflerfish.org/download.html

I found that the footprint of Equinox framework is much larger than one
of knopflerfish.

	Equinox:827KB
		(org.eclipse.osgi_3.2.0.v20060601.jar)

	Knopflerfish:  290KB
		(framework.jar in knopflerfish_osgi_tiny_2.0.0-RC1.jar)

The web page tells that "org.eclipse.osgi_3.2.0.v20060601.jar" contains
additional mechanisms (e.g., x-internal, platform filters, ...). That
must be one of reasons.

Was there anyone or project who tried to make a package which contains
only fundamental OSGi framework function ( minimal equinox) ? (If there
is, could you tell me how much was it?)

-------------------
NTT Cyber Solutions Lab.
     Ikuo YAMASAKI
E-mail: yamasaki.ikuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.