[equinox-dev] bundle name x unique id

[Rafael Chaves <Rafael_Chaves@xxxxxxxxxx>]

In the RFC, are bundle names and unique
ids synonyms? 

I would say that they shouldn't be synonyms.
That would allow us to keep the loose semantics of bundle-name and restrict
the semantics of the new bundle-unique-id. For instance, I don't think
an object should be able to change its id. So it would make sense to allow
changing a bundle's name during an update operation, but not its unique
id.

Comments?

Rafael