David,
Dennis has enabled builds for our maintenance streams and we still
have the builds for the head of the stream, so I think everything is
in place.
Note that I've not properly incremented bundle/feature versions for
the maintenance fixes I've done in both streams. Eike Stepper and I
have been working on a tool that automatically checks for the
missing required increments much like API tooling checks for API
changes and missing corresponding version changes. We'll be able to
share that tool with the Eclipse community in the coming week (when
we've finished documenting it).
Regards,
Ed
On 07/08/2012 6:08 AM, David M Williams
wrote:
Hi all,
As I hope you know :) Kepler M1
+0 is
this Friday. We in the Platform (try to) produce our (final)
candidate
for it Wednesday night at 8 PM Eastern.
In the past, for Juno (at least,
near
the end, when I started to get it right) we'd get EMF's "final
base
build" Wednesday afternoon, even though the reset of EMF is not
due
until later.
How's it going for Kepler? Same
plans?
Will you have anything new for Kepler M1?
From looking at
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/emf-base-head/
it appears you have done some
builds
since Juno, but, none since mid-July, and I do not yet see any
"2.9
repositories" under
/home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates
(for neither S-builds nor
I-builds).
So, thought I'd ask explicitly.
I'd
be fine with no changes for EMF for Kepler M1 (less work for
me:) but wanted
to be sure we kept our plans in sync.
Thanks for any info.
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
emf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
|