[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ejb-dev] Request for review on PR# 74 and 75
|
Yes, probably. I leave it to your discretion! :-)
Tracy Burroughs wrote on 3/4/20 11:06
AM:
Ah, right,
JTS is
only mentioned in one part of the EJB spec, which in a nutshell
says it
isn't required. Since the JTS spec won't be part of Jakarta EE,
should
we just drop that section from the Jakarta Enterprise Beans
spec, and then
not reference the old JTS spec?
-- Tracy Burroughs (tkb@xxxxxxxxxx)
-- WebSphere Application Server Development
-- IBM Rochester, Dept WG8A H315/050-2
-- 2800 37th Street NW, Rochester MN 55901-4441
From:
Bill
Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
ejb
developer discussions <ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Tracy
Burroughs <tkb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
03/04/2020
12:38 PM
Subject:
[EXTERNAL]
Re: [ejb-dev] Request for review on PR# 74 and 75
Tracy Burroughs wrote on 3/4/20 8:46
AM:
Java™ API for
XML-based
RPC, version 1.1 (JAX-RPC)should
go away. My understanding is that would not be in Jakarta EE 9,
and
all references to it should be removed from the EJB 4.0
specification.
I agree.
Not sure
about
JSR 109. If there isn't a Jakarta version of that spec, then it
too
should be eliminated. What part of the EJB spec is referencing
it?
It should remain; see my previous
message.
The "Java
Transaction Service" is a important part of the EJB
specification...
and there must be some Jakarta spec that covers it, but I don't
know where
that went.
JTS is the implementation under
JTA.
None of the JTS APIs are part of the spec.
_______________________________________________
ejb-dev mailing list
ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ejb-dev__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!N1vJP5iTc2ZI4qqN_uzCEeHGor8FelpX50eiSoqRpRiTfXoISPtt8IrlR2M1RwHmmQ$