A committer vote pushed during a big conference such as CodeOne SFO is/was a bad idea. Its current outcome has nothing to do with awesome Mark S. but with the chosen timing. Lesson learned, let's move forward.
I recommend start a new vote next week— many of us are still recuperating from OC1 Scott! :)
Cheers,
Scott,According to the
Eclipse guidelines, a committer election requires three +1 votes (with
no -1 votes). Since your CDI team is so small, you might need to
nudge Emily and/or Matej to cast the final +1 vote to get Mark in. There
is no lazy consensus for committer elections.
--------------------------------------------------- Kevin Sutter STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office) LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutterFrom:
Scott
Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>To:
EE4J
PMC Discussions <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>Date:
09/24/2019
03:05 PMSubject:
[EXTERNAL]
[ee4j-pmc] So there is no lazy consensus for votes?Sent
by: ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx We ran a new CDI member vote:https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.cdi/elections/election-mark-struberg-committer-jakarta-contexts-and-dependency-injectionThat failed because it did not receive
enough votes? There are only 4 CDI committers currently, so what is the
required number of votes to have a new committer added?_______________________________________________ ee4j-pmc mailing list ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc
_______________________________________________ ee4j-pmc mailing list ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc
|