| Re: [eclipselink-users] Eclipselink 1.0.1 + Spring on GFV2UR2 - other issues (Toplink Essentials) |
Make sure you are setting your provider in your persistence.xml to EclipseLink. Jan Vissers wrote: > > Apart from the META-INF/orm.xml not being spotted correctly in this > (Spring enabled) setup. > I also see something strange happening during deployment, which points to > Toplink Essentials > getting in the way of EclipseLink 1.0.1. Somewhere in the log (during > deployment) the following > line is written: > > [#|2008-10-20T07:56:24.778+0200|WARNING|sun-appserver9.1|oracle.toplink.essentials.session.file:/home/jvissers/Work/containers/glassfish-v2ur2/ > glassfish/domains/domain1/applications/j2ee-modules/cumquat-brandportal-services/WEB-INF/classes/-image-bank.ejb_or_metadata|_ThreadID=17;_ThreadName=Thread-35; > _RequestID=7f3d2c87-9073-4486-8bc0-a082f58af64e;|Ignoring LAZY fetch type > on element [private byte[] > com.cumquatit.brandportal.domain.model.imagebank.ImageData.data] > within entity class [class > com.cumquatit.brandportal.domain.model.imagebank.ImageData]. All basic > mappings default to use EAGER fetching.|#] > > Apparently Toplink Essentials is 'doing something' along with the > deployment. I want to use EclipseLink 1.0.1 - > so how do I stop this from happening? > > -J > ----- --- http://wiki.eclipse.org/User:James.sutherland.oracle.com James Sutherland http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/ EclipseLink , http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/ TopLink Wiki: http://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink EclipseLink , http://wiki.oracle.com/page/TopLink TopLink Forums: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=48 TopLink , http://www.nabble.com/EclipseLink-f26430.html EclipseLink Book: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence Java Persistence -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Eclipselink-1.0.1-%2B-Spring-on-GFV2UR2---other-issues-%28Toplink-Essentials%29-tp20063659p20068024.html Sent from the EclipseLink - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.