Re: [ecf-dev] Luna comitment

[Markus Alexander Kuppe <ecf-dev_eclipse.org@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/09/2013 09:34 PM, Steffen Pingel wrote:
> speaking as an integrator of ECF, we would possibly end up removing ECF
> dependencies from Mylyn if ECF didn't ship as part of the release train.
> Consuming non release train repositories adds more overhead when managing
> our targets and trying to match project releases to Eclipse releases can be
> quite time consuming. We also couldn't include ECF based functionality in
> the release train repository then.
> 
> The same problem arises for users who'd have to figure out which ECF
> repository to add when installing Mylyn.
> 
> This can all be simplified by having ECF bits in the release train. In that
> spirit, I hope the ECF project continues to participate to make it easy for
> integrators and users to consume ECF.

Hi Steffen,

is rewriting Mylyn actually less time consuming than using another repo?

Btw. what parts of ECF does Mylyn depend on anyway?

M.