[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [ecf-dev] proposal: ECF 3.7
|
Hi Folks,
Any comments from committers or contributors about this? Any other work
that's been going on that could/would be added to this list?
After looking at the Kepler SR1 release schedule [1], I sent a note to
Wayne Beaton asking if there was sufficient time to have a release
review (for ECF 3.7) prior to about 9/9.
But are there other committers able to work on ECF during latter half of
August? I'll probably need some help with review materials creation,
and I will certainly need some help with releng/build changes to support
bug [4] below, as well as the timeservice examples additions.
Thanks,
Scott
[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Kepler/Simultaneous_Release_Plan
On 8/8/2013 9:45 AM, Scott Lewis wrote:
Hi Folks,
Proposal for general discussion: ECF releases 3.7.0 in September 2013.
What would this minor release consist of you say? Well, here's what
I know about:
1) New bundle/API: org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservice.servlet [1]
2) A number of bug fixes/robustness improvements in remote
services...e.g. [2]
3) New 'timeservice' OSGi remote services example...along with custom
rest-based provider [3]
4) I believe Markus has been working with dnssd discovery provider, so
that could be included as well
5) Any other things that committers and/or contributors have been
working on
Also...we've been requested [4] to use a more recent version of
httpcomponents [4] so that only one version appears in the luna repo.
This is not a lot of work (IP requests, small changes to our build,
testing), but since we need to do release builds...
In any event...comments/thoughts/other things that people either have
been working on or would like to get into such a release would be
appreciated. I agree the above would not constitute the largest minor
release we've done, but I think it does justify a minor release (i.e.
review, etc). And having the timing be such that it could be part of
Kepler maintenance release wouldn't hurt...in terms of visibility,
promotion, etc.
Thanks,
Scott
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=414086
[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=414448
[3]
http://www.eclipse.org/community/eclipse_newsletter/2013/july/article3.php
and http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ecf-dev/msg06448.html
[4] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=414591
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
