Re: [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers

[ahmed.aadel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

From:	Markus Alexander Kuppe <ecf-dev_eclipse.org@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	28-01-2011 10:30
Subject:	Re: [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers

---

On 01/26/2011 06:41 PM, Martin Petzold wrote:
> Am 26.01.2011 15:01, schrieb Markus Alexander Kuppe:
>> how fast a new service gets
>> discovery/a gone service gets undiscovered
> I would like to optimize how fast a new service gets discovery/a gone
> service gets undiscovered in a subnet. Could zookeeper be somehow
> faster, even if SLP and JmDNS are more low level.

>Zookeeper and SLP/JmDNS work quite differently. Where SLP/JmDNS use
>multicast, Zookeeper uses a unicast connection. Thus Zookeeper will
be
>naturally faster (for small numbers of client), but it has the drawback
>that it requires client configuration (IP of Zookeeper server).

This statement is based on what facts?
><..> (for small numbers of client)
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev