[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
On 10/02/2010 08:56 AM, Markus Alexander Kuppe wrote:
> On 10/02/2010 01:02 AM, Scott Lewis wrote:
>
>> Yes, I understand that this the typical case (requires in features being
>> same as target platform)...but you are also right that they are distinct
>> things...that is, the required plugins in feature.xml end up being in
>> the p2 metadata...and that's why I don't really want to have the
>> requires be used to set the target platform for compile/build. An
>> example of why this doesn't work very well for edge cases is optional
>> bundle dependencies...they shouldn't be in requires (for target
>> platform), but they *do* need to be present for the compiler.
>
> That's why optional bundles go into the buckminster.cspex of the feature
> and not into requires. But org.eclipse.ecf.remoteservices is not an
> optional dependency for jms.
The build has been fixed [0] by adding a buckminster.cpsex.
Markus
[0]
http://github.com/ECF/JMS/commit/c7d0a3206206ad1c7e8cb0df849eaf2374d4e4c2
