Re: org.jivesoftware.smack31 (was Re: [ecf-dev] feature.xml IDs vs. fold

[Markus Alexander Kuppe <ecf-dev_eclipse.org@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/11/2009 06:08 PM, Scott Lewis wrote:

> The reason so was that we can/could also build the 2.2.0 version of
> smack.  Since smack is not our codebase, using a branch for a single
> project would/could become rather complicated.

Are you going to (actively) work on smack 2.2.0? If not, won't it be
easier to just consume a pre-build bundle from an ealier ECF p2 repo?
Btw. have you thought about moving smack to Orbit? Might open it up to a
bigger audience too.

> RE: build problems...not sure what you mean.  I do understand that it
> complicates the build a little bit (the need to map to
> org.jivesoftware.smack31 project name for org.jivesoftware.smack
> bundle), but this doesn't seem like too much of a problem (?).

I'm currently changing the build so that we don't need map files
anymore. However Buckminster fails to find a project
org.jivesoftware.smack with version 3.x because it does not recognize
org.jivesoftware.smack31 as an alternative provider.

Markus